Who diag­nosed this three-year-old kid (ref­er­enced in the last graph) with bipo­lar dis­or­der?? Can some­one in the med­ical pro­fes­sions please tell me a way in which this makes sense? Three-year olds are all over the place men­tally because they're, um, three-year-olds.
And it only makes the cake taste bet­ter to know poor kids get drugged at twice the rate of their richer coun­ter­parts. I imag­ine that hap­pens with adults, too, but I've not seen any research to that effect. Read for your­self, in the NY Times.
New fed­er­ally financed drug research reveals a stark dis­par­ity: chil­dren cov­ered by Med­ic­aid are given pow­er­ful antipsy­chotic med­i­cines at a rate four times higher than chil­dren whose par­ents have pri­vate insur­ance. And the Med­ic­aid chil­dren are more likely to receive the drugs for less severe con­di­tions than their middle-class coun­ter­parts, the data shows.

Those find­ings, by a team from Rut­gers and Colum­bia, are almost cer­tain to add fuel to a long-running debate. Do too many chil­dren from poor fam­i­lies receive pow­er­ful psy­chi­atric drugs not because they actu­ally need them — but because it is deemed the most effi­cient and cost-effective way to con­trol prob­lems that may be han­dled much dif­fer­ently for middle-class chil­dren?